Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Indrebø incident

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Indrebø incident

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ephemeral news piece. Geschichte (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOT#NEWSREPORTS--William Thweatt ^Talk | ^Contribs 20:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we are not a news service and the few encyclopedic lines it might warrant can be covered in trial of Anders Behring Breivik. Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:36, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with all editors above; this is a single-incident news report. There's also no level of lasting significant coverage to demonstrate the notability of the event. -- Lord Roem (talk) 01:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This so-called "incident" is not notable enough to warrant an article in its own right. It is already covered for as much as it is worth in the trial article. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This incident is just an aspect of the Trial of Anders Behring Breivik and is already covered in that article. It's not a separate news event of its own. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete/rant what a moron of a judge...how could he have any crediibility left on pre-determined "neutrality"!

Anyhoo, its 1 para long it can go on the trial page. Or it can be redirected there.Lihaas (talk) 11:17, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, keep in mind that he is a lay judge, not a judge. A lay judge is a sort of professional juror in some countries. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 16:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.