Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Green (Writer and Medium)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:28, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Green (Writer and Medium)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Individual fails criteria for WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG. Has self-published one book (through pay-to-publish Eloquent Publishing). Google search for book finds no results and no coverage for this person has been found. Green's own bio page make no assertion of notability. (Note that the name is common -- including a popular Jesuit author named Thomas H. Green). — CactusWriter | ^needles 15:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — — CactusWriter | ^needles 15:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For failure of WP:AUTHOR. I'm not finding any coverage of this person or his "book". Common name does make searching difficult but its the responsibility of the article createor to properly source the article so I think Cactus Writer and I have done due diligence here. Fringey subject mater doesn't give me much hope that reliable sources might be found. RadioFan (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication he is notable. Can't find significant coverage in reliable sources. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 15:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —RadioFan (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. —RadioFan (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Mr. Green has no doubt already predicted the deletion of this article. --Milowent (talk) 20:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 06:29, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Author of one vanity press book. Main notability is as victim of an apparent scam [1]. Simonm223 (talk) 15:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Failed to find any relevant sources to support notability, and without sourcing, fails WP:BLP. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 18:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, would appear to fail WP:BIO due to lack of reliable third-party sources. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 21:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]
'Delete per WP:BIO. Orderinchaos 01:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.