Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Denny (fighter)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Thomas Denny (fighter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NMMA notability criteria. his highest quarterly ranking by FightMatrix was thirty fourth, falling short of the top 10 requirement, also never reached Sherdog's top 10. Closest thing I found to significant or indepth coverage was a Bleacher Report article about his appearance on Bully Beatdown, where he failed to submit or knockout the bully, essentially marking his performance as the worst in the shows history, but that's one article, I'd like to see more independent reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 07:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and California. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 07:40, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails to meet WP:NMMA. Maybe if his epic failure on bully beatdown is enough to generate multiple in depth articles then sure. -Imcdc (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete He appeared to have got success only at KOTC. He clearly fails WP:NMMA and I don't believe he has the coverage to meet WP:GNG. Even more coverage of his "failure on bully beatdown" would run afoul of WP:BLP1E, while fight results and database entries don't provide significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 22:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.