Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Holwerda (editor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 00:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thom Holwerda (editor)[edit]

Thom Holwerda (editor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of the managing editor of a website, referenced exclusively to primary sources with not a whit of reliable source coverage to demonstrate that he's notable for anything more than existing. Also probable WP:COI, as it was created by User:Tholwer. As usual, Wikipedia is not a public relations database on which anybody is entitled to post an unsourced profile of themselves for promotional purposes, if reliable source coverage isn't there to support it. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - searches on the engines only turned up a few brief mentions on News, nothing to rise to the level of notability. Onel5969 TT me 13:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.