Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is Danko Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Danko Jones#2009: B-Sides. (non-admin closure) Ambrosiawater (talk) 11:44, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Is Danko Jones[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable poorly sourced article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:NMUSIC, I could find no reviews of this album. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should try searching "This is Danko Jones" review. This comes up, albeit short. And after that it's a dead end for me as well :) Geschichte (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, guess I didn't go deep enough into google. Nevertheless, that doesn't change the equation, that source is really not even enough to be considered SIGCOV. Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Danko Jones#2009: B-Sides as a clear alternative to deletion. Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap. czar 05:25, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Danko Jones#2009: B-Sides. Aside from an Exclaim review presented above, there's not enough sources to meet WP:NALBUM. SBKSPP (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.