Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Had Oscar Buzz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Had Oscar Buzz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Doesn't appear to be the subject of significant and independent coverage per GNG. The best I can find are passing mentions, a la AVClub or Vanity Fair[1][2] Other references such as Vulture and Primetimer are also pretty minor, and written by the hosts themselves. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 17:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I am not sure about meeting GNG. I am ready to change my vote if new info will be discovered. Kolma8 (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was able to find one independent review of the podcast, but that was about it. Most of the mentions in Google News search are just picking up the mention of the podcast in the story author's blurb. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly not notable. GNG not met. Java Hurricane 16:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.