Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This 15 Me World Tour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This 15 Me World Tour[edit]

This 15 Me World Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Easily fails WP:GNG. Prose and content is a quick fail. Generally unaccepted standards per WP:MOS. Insufficiently sourced and ridden with fancruft, puffery and issues of neutrality (WP:NPOV, WP:FAN, WP:PUFF),. It doesn't require it's own article per WP:CONCERT. Itssheenabautista (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:53, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Sarah Geronimo: Per nominator. Some of the content can be merged to the artist's article. ASTIG😎 (ICE TICE CUBE) 06:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as the concert has received multiple reliable sources reviews such as Rappler and others. There is also a claim of significance that it is her most succesful tour and there is enough referenced content to justify a stand alone article, passes WP:GNG imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Easy keep. Almost ten WP:RS? And using WP:MOS as a deletion reason? Seriously? AFD is not cleanup. Nominator surely didn't read WP:BEFORE. Howard the Duck (talk) 05:58, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Changed my vote, per above. The article needs some clean-up with parts which need citations. Other than that, with a lot of reliable sources there, the article easily passes WP:GNG. ASTIG😎 (ICE TICE CUBE) 04:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.