Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ThinkMarkets

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 July 10.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 March 14.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 February 11.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 January 30.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ThinkMarkets[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shows all the hallmarkes of a commissioned piece, with most references to financemagnates.com (7) and leaprate.com (4), "the world’s only multi-asset online/electronic trading knowledge hub" and and "independent research and advisory firm, specialized in covering the world of Forex trading". According tho those sources themselves. There is no significant, in-depth coverage in independent and reliable sources. Mduvekot (talk) 20:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I've been able to find... not much. And I scoured. There's a ton of Google hits, but it's either one of two things: 1) one of their analysts being quoted at a RS (which this article does not inherit notability from) (search here: [1]) and 2) a maybe notable different blog called "ThinkMarkets" that is cited in some books and other locations and completely unrelated to the subject of the article (blog linked here: [2]). Financemagnates.com has no editorial policy and neither does leaprate.com. I have to !vote delete. Nomader (talk) 23:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.