Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Things We Lost in the Fire (Grey's Anatomy)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nominator does not provide a valid rationale for deletion (see WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales), and no delete !votes are present in the discussion. Provision of a link to an entire content guideline page is present in the nomination (WP:EPISODE), but a deletion rationale is not provided by the nominator relative to content at the guideline page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Things We Lost in the Fire (Grey's Anatomy)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Episodes do not necessarily deserve their own article, WP:Episode ~ Preceding post created by larsona ^//Talk// 19:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not, but could you explain why you think this one doesn't? Is it non-notable or too soon? I notice the air date was only a few days ago, and that other episodes such as the previous one haven't been nominated. Adam9007 (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue. Either this is notable, in which case we should keep it, or it isn't, in which case we should redirect it to List of Grey's Anatomy episodes because it's a plausible search term. Whatever we do with this material won't involve using the "delete" button.—S Marshall T/C 01:22, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- AfD can be useful in determining consensus regarding whether it should be kept or redirected, and such a discussion can be pointed to when the need arises. There are more potential results for an AfD close than just keep or delete. clpo13_(talk) 22:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - nominator does not list a valid reason for deletion. This is a relatively popular series that has many standalone articles on its episodes. There seems to be the usual episode reviews and coverage in RS. —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.