Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theresa Bernstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 00:24, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Theresa Bernstein[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As an artist, doesn't seem to meet WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG. Only claim to notability seems to be through being very old when she died, which would fail WP:NOTABILITY per WP:1E. Boleyn (talk) 07:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I can find quite a few reliable sources mentioning her, enough to meet WP:GNG. This one states "Her paintings are in the permanent collections of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Library of Congress, the Smithsonian Institution, the Chicago Art Institute, the New York Public Library and the Brooklyn Museum", which means she does meet WP:ARTIST.Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The subject is definitely notable based upon her paintings being in the permanent collections of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Smithsonian Institution, and other world-renowned galleries. The article therefore should be edited with much additional information, and the emphasis should be placed on her art, rather than her personal life. HillbillyGoat (talk) 22:53, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep based on the scope and breadth of her work, as supported based on reliable and verifiable sources about her. Alansohn (talk) 18:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per above keeps. If we get two or three more, this can be closed by SNOW.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.