Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/There Is a Man In Our House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Talk! 15:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There Is a Man In Our House[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See WP:Junk Ethanlu121 (talk) 02:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I have cleaned up the article and added references now. Not an instance of WP:JUNK in it's current form. Hitro talk 14:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Nothing in the updated references goes beyond capsule review. The BFI article is long but only a short paragraph is about this film. My searches found nothing helpful to retention. Gab4gab (talk) 18:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you sure you checked all the Arabic and Russian sources related to this movie? I couldn't cuz I don't read or write either of the those languages. I did some clean up just to address the WP:JUNK issue raised by the nominator. Just for your information, per WP:NPOSSIBLE, Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. Hitro talk 21:20, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm never sure that I've checked all the sources that exist. I'm happy to reconsider if someone point out significant coverage from a reliable source. Gab4gab (talk) 12:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Given the particular desire to avoid systemic geographical bias, the provided sources are sufficient to warrant an article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Please explain how the desire to avoid bias results a lower standard of notability for this film. Gab4gab (talk) 00:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. An important film in the history of the Egyptian cinema. Some sources in Arabic: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] --Meno25 (talk) 13:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for providing additional sources. I confess I couldn't follow the meaning of the much of that but it does look like significant coverage so I'm changing to Keep. Gab4gab (talk) 00:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.