Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thenginkalbetta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thenginkalbetta

Seems to be a nonexistent town, Google (both standard and maps) turns up nothing for this town. Maybe a hoax? NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 12:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless sources can be produced. The article says that this is a hill, not a town. I'm of the opinion that major topographic features are inherently notable, but unless some evidence of the very existence of this hill can be found, the article fails WP:V. In addition, its current form is unsuitable because Wikipedia is not a travel guide. If it can be sourced, I might support keeping a stubbed version of the article. Deor (talk) 12:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fully in agreement with Deor. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 05:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This appears a hoax. Unless this is a misspelling, there's nothing on google. --Oakshade (talk) 06:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails policy verifiability. If sources can be found, then it would be a keep as a geographic feature. But there is zero sources that can be found when searching for this name. -- Whpq (talk) 17:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.