Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Themes 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:18, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Themes 2[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy WP:NALBUM criteria. FamblyCat94 (talk) 06:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 06:47, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Reviews from Allmusic and Option online. Will have further coverage in print sources. --Michig (talk) 07:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 07:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have added a {{cite book}} to the review in Option and ditto to their entry in Colin Larkin's Encyclopedia of Popular Music. I believe Michig is right, and that we can expect to find futher sources in print. Sam Sailor 09:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.