Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theistic psychology
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Non notable neologism (on a popular topic to be sure, but that is insufficient) --++Lar: t/c 13:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another monograph by User:Leonj on a term coined by himself (Leon James, see also semantic satiation) in 2004. Similarly low Google count, slightly more of them track to places other than James' own sites, but still does not look like a widely-used term. Looks like protologism / vanity / OR. Just zis Guy you know? 12:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DarthVader 13:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per JzG. Proto/neo/OR. Fan1967 13:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research. Gwernol 13:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a neologism.--Isotope23 15:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It does have this appearance right now because it is being looked at by several people who would like to add content on this topic but haven't yet. Also, as the article grows, more history will be added as it ties to dualism in science and to Swedenborg's stature in history. The topic deserves attention as it is related to spirituality, God, immortality, heaven, hell -- extremely popular topics for many readers on the Web. —The preceding Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages comment was added by Leonj (talk • contribs) 05:08, June 7, 2006.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.