The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 08:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Website spam. If this site is judged sufficiently notable to Keep, article needs significant rewriting. Hynca-Hooley 22:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Advertising. [Added "delete" vote to nominator's argument above.]Slowmover 23:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable Edgar181 23:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional, no evidence of notability. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 14:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
