Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theatrical run of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:21, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Theatrical run of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:INDISCRIMINATE: Excessive listing of statistics. We don't need box office grosses for every single territory - looking at the talk page, and the edit summary for prod removal, I think there is some consensus to trim and merge. Rob Sinden (talk) 08:15, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Excessive statistics, as proposal - writing it as text rather than a statistics table doesn't get around that rule. List of highest-grossing films and similar articles contains the most important information, and basic details on the film's performance could be included in a short table in the main article on the film (there's no need to give the grosses of other films it outperformed there, or the grosses in every country). --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:20, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 07:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.