Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theam (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Theam[edit]

Theam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

second nom, still doesn't meet notability and has seen no improvement since the first nom Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; just a directory listing for a nn company. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Distinguishing this firm from both the similarly-named US firm and the BNP investment entity, I am seeing confirmation that it is a firm going about its business, such as the brief mention in relation to a partnership with Made SA in this 2018 "La Tribune" article, but without the necessary coverage to show that the firm is of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 07:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.