Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thea Hamann Rasmussen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thea Hamann Rasmussen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar case to Ekaterina Skivko.

I will do a source analysis on the sources cited and will also include a couple that I found in my own searches, which include DDG (full name), DDG (shorter name), Zip News and Google News under both the shorter and longer name. Zip News with her full name returned zero results. Players could get presumed notability through WP:SPORTCRIT if they have played in a major international competition at the highest level, but Rasmussen hasn't played in the European Championship, nor the World Championship nor the Olympics. There is no evidence that she is a significantly notable figure within handball in the sense that it would allow us to completely ignore GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Handball-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

**Source assessment table:**
Source	Independent?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
http://dhdb.hyldgaard-jensen.dk/spiller.php?id=11003		Stats page for her youth teams	✘ No
http://history.eurohandball.com/ech/17/women/2019/player/599745/Thea+Hamann+Rasmussen		Minimal stats page	✘ No
http://skanderborghaandbold.dk/2021/02/pressemeddelelse-thea-rasmussen/	Press release from the club that she plays for	Routine sportsperson announcement of signing a contract	✘ No
http://skanderborghaandbold.dk/2021/07/kommende-ligaspillere-til-u-19-em/	Published by her own club	Routine youth team call up announcement, these never confer notability	✘ No
https://www.haandbold.dk/landsholdsinfo/spiller/243241_3		Stats	✘ No
http://skanderborghaandbold.dk/2017/01/mr-fredericia-bliver-ny-cheftraener/	Her own club	Mentioned once	✘ No
https://sport.tv2.dk/haandbold/2021-09-20-skanderborg-jeg-takker-jer		Whilst this is the best source available, it's still only 4 sentences about her and not enough to justify an entire article.	✘ No
https://skanderborg.lokalavisen.dk/sport/ECE13108276/kommende-ligaspillere-til-u19-em/		Trivial U19 coverage	✘ No
https://handbollskanalen.se/danmark-damer/danmark-fortsatt-succe-for-svenska-spelare/		Mentioned once	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She is a youth player with no coverage. --🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 07:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:SPORTCRIT as not having played on the highest level of her sport. I think that someone thinks handball U20 championship players are notable. Geschichte (talk) 03:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page was created by User:Essiepolman79. If you look at his talk page there are many AfD's. He created some pages about U20 handball players. Many of them are not notable or have very low notability. --🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 08:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:SPORTCRIT and GNG per convincing source analysis by Spiderone.4meter4 (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hmm you guys are so welcome to delete the page. Whatever, it's just an Wikipedia article, nothing notable, so why even spend time on it? And btw I am a girl, you male chauvinist.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Essiepolman79 (talk • contribs) 13:40, 7. Okt. 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.