Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The people vs. Kreuzer, Turnwald-Wacker, Müller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Legal advertising. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The people vs. Kreuzer, Turnwald-Wacker, Müller[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Both English and German source searches for the name of the case, its official number and the situation surrounding the dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant turn up nothing other than official documents relating to the case. There is no secondary coverage and a search in Scholar and JSTOR turn up little indication the case has had a significant impact on German jurisprudence. Much of the article appears to be original research, including the transliteration of the title. I'm nominating this for deletion as it appears to fail the general notability guideline. SITH (talk) 12:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence that GNG are met, just a sidenote in the history of lawyers in Germany. Also, no improvement in more than 6 years since I last looked at the page. —Kusma (t·c) 21:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge this article into a section on Germany within Legal advertising, which this will work much better in rather than a little-visited title like this. Nate • (chatter) 02:22, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to legal advertising with a brief mention in legal advertising. This case can be summed up in one or two sentences in that article and it would do the same job. Cosmic Sans (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.