Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The operational to liberal the hala'ib triangle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Halaib Triangle#History. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The operational to liberal the hala'ib triangle[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This only has one source from youtube and I could only find mention in large pdfs. Qwerfjkl talk 21:25, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:57, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is not very professionaly written or even titled. There is more substantial content at Halaib Triangle#History as well as the see also links in that article. Geschichte (talk) 08:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to either Halaib Triangle#History, Egypt–Sudan relations or both if reliable sources can be found. A redirect would have to be kept as well for the edit history, despite the terrible title. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:14, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
despite the terrible title it could be moved first. ― Qwerfjkl talk 10:11, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Halaib Triangle#History, poorly written with minimal content and references and there is valid merge/redirect target. Mztourist (talk) 04:03, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Totally garbage article, as evidenced by the mispelled title. There's frankly no good reason to move paragraphs of unsourced/poorly sourced content to the parent article. Let that material naturally accumulate with good sources. -Indy beetle (talk) 03:14, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article doesn't have any reliably sourced content, it appears to cover a subject already covered by a component of another article, and this is in need of WP:TNT. If I were to see a redirect from this to Halaib Triangle#History at RfD, I would have likely !voted to delete that along the lines of WP:R3, so I don't see a reason to leave a redirect in place. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Indy beetle and Mikehawk10. Nothing encyclopedic worth preserving via merger in this article, and the redirect left behind is an implausible typo. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

keepThe article is about the military operation itself and does not talk about the border conflict as a whole, so I put a source that covered the military operation only, and it needs more development and I will work on this--Ahmed88z (talk) 16:17, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.