Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The musical parody

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a1 no context, a7 nonnotable group, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The musical parody[edit]

I was unable to verify any of this article's contents on Google or the Internet Movie Database, which means the article is likely either a hoax or insufficiently verifiable and notable for our coverage. It could possibly be redirected to Parody music. Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 19:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable source cited, and I can find none. Probable hoax, but anyway not notable. JohnCD (talk) 19:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Possibly speedy? Sounds like a hoax to me. Sasuke9031 (talk) 22:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per JohnCD. The creator appears to be aware of the need to provide a decent citation -- but only managed to provide a link to a myspace account. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 22:22, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of verifiability... Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles, is that really you as nominator of this AFD? o_O —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, it indeed is! :) --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 22:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool! Happy editing to you as well! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 01:07, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ... because if it made the Citrus King become a "deletionist", then there truly is no hope for this article. Mandsford (talk) 00:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sadly this doesn't fall any of the speedy categories, because it's quite obviously inappropriate for Wikipedia (if not an outright hoax). Time for a snowball close? Terraxos (talk) 02:31, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced WP:BALLS. Beeblbrox (talk) 05:51, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No relevant google hits outside Wikipedia. Hoaxalicious. PC78 (talk) 07:22, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google is not a lynchpin to go by, but when a search of "The musical parody" with its supposed writer, "Daniel Solorzano" reveals only one hit: the Wikipedia article, it is highly likely that this is essentially wholly unverifiable material, either made up by the WP:SPA and/or in support of the previously put-forward Myspace. Either way, not notable. WilliamH (talk) 11:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Keep: This content would have to have several credible citations to merit serious consideration. Extremely dubious. dr.ef.tymac (talk) 06:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.