Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The lost generation (t.l.g)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 01:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lost generation (t.l.g)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsure if this meets the general notability guideline. Questionable references. [Belinrahs|^talktome⁄ _ididit] 18:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 19:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the sources provided in this article are reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:BAND. Angryapathy (talk) 21:41, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 23:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can find no in-depth coverage for this band, and they do not satisfy any of the other criteria for WP:BAND. Their best bet probably would have been criterion 5, but Rustyjukebox appears to be neither a "major label or one of the more important indie labels." Gongshow ^Talk 01:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.