Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The last of us

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The last of us[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article that is entirely speculative -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no substance to article. Crystal-ball-gazing. Possibly bring back when evidence becomes available. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-information suitable for a blog, not an encyclopedia. LadyofShalott 22:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The game is currently in development and Content will be added to the page as soon as it is available, i am still adding more detail to it as we speak. This game has now been announced and the wiki page should be created for it. -Fluffyman24- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fluffyman24 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:CRYSTAL. Recreate once more solid facts are known. (No reason to keep until then - the entire article would virtually need to be redone anyways...) Sergecross73 msg me 16:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. The reason giving for keeping is "Content will be added to the page as soon as it is available", but we don't have articles on the basis of speculation that suitable information will become available some time in the future: we need evidence of notability now, and we haven't got it. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in reply to JamesBWatson, there is more information coming out on the 10/12/2011 there will be more information at that point.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.93.140.174 (talk)

The main problem with that is that for an article to be meet the notability guideline the subject needs to be covered by independent sources which are also reliable. The company releasing the game offering more content about the game would not meet that standard since it is not independent of the subject. Unless other sources cover this the article will not meet the guideline. --199.91.207.3 (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The game has now been announced to be developed by Naughty Dog so another possibility may be to redirect the game to the developer until there is enough information to split the article.--70.24.215.154 (talk) 22:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.