Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The kung fu mummy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 06:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The kung fu mummy

This entry violates every possible guidelines for notability of films. A quick Google search shows no results when it comes to news articles. The only really relevant hits are either the official website or IMDB - which the notability guidelines say is a good source, but doesn't prove notability. When you see how their presence on IMDB is hyped on the links section of the official website, I tend to agree.

Delete. Mgm|^(talk) 11:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. -- Rehnn83 ^Talk 13:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be only available on DVD from the filmmakers--equivalent notability to a self-published book or album. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. --Edtropolis 13:56, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please do not cite a proposed guideline as a guideline for deleting an article. Edison 14:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failure to show it has had significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject as per WP:N. Edison 14:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Speaks poorly for the authoritative nature of IMDB. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 14:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
del --Ghirla^-трёп- 14:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This movie almost is notable for its complete lack of any mention in any WP:RS. It's entry in IMBD is odd as is its entry on Amazon.com. If they can get some WP:RS to comment on that, then it might be a keeper. However, delete since does not meet WP:N. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 17:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete*Coeur-sang 19:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delte per nom. IP198 14:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.