Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The integral (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. No evidence of notability. Dweller (talk) 13:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The integral (band)

The band's notability is not easily confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NN melodic modern rock group. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no problems about the band existing, but finding reliably sourced info on them is pretty slim pickings. The closest I got was this; [1]. Everything else pointed to myspace or to blogs which had their press release from myspace. Couldn't even find anything about said tour to Japan (apart from myspace) which would have allowed them to get in on WP:MUSIC#C4. a bit to soon I think, delete. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Fails all WP:BAND criteria. Fails WP:BAND#C4 specifically due to lack of sources on the Japan tour. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 05:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 15:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 15:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep needs heavily editing and to have reliable sources added too. Ijanderson977 (talk) 16:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: - anyone searching for sources may also want to look for the band name Pacer, as that is what they were called until 2007. DigitalC (talk) 01:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried various searches (for example) on Google News archives, and also in a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, but have not been able to find any third-party sources. Delete unless sources are forthcoming before the end of this deletion discussion. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm willing to consider that the band might be sufficiently notable, per Vans Warped and Japanese tour claims, as well as a prior band name that does sound vaguely familiar to me, but don't see any evidence in the article as written. I'll change my vote to keep if proper sources can be located, but right now it's a delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if there is no listing of band members, it is most highly unlikely for the band to have even sufficient coverage by reliable sources to meet WP:MUSIC. While the article attempts to establish local notability. there is not enough there to differentiate this group (sorry folks - with that name, I had to try) from the hundreds, if not thousands, of local bands in North America. B.Wind (talk) 02:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.