Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The effect of Brexit on climate policy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There isn't a chance this is going to end any other way, and WP:NOTBURO. Wikipedia is not a place for essays. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The effect of Brexit on climate policy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Typical WikiEd project that is written as a term paper and not as an encyclopedia article. Excluded from Wikipedia by WP:NOTESSAY. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 22:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 22:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 22:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I wouldn't be against userfying this, as I am sure some of the content is salvageable and usable in existing articles with a bit of editing. Unfortunately both this WikiEd participant and their course leader seem not to understand the difference between an encyclopedia article and an essay. As the nom says this falls foul of WP:NOTESSAY, and imo also WP:CRYSTAL (especially point 3). – filelakeshoe (t / c)  22:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There may be some salvageable content, but this particular article isn't where to put it. I'd question the merits of userfication for the same reason, to be honest. I do share the concerns regarding the confusion about articles versus essays, too. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:38, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is clearly against WP:NOTESSAY and WP:CRYSTAL as already shown above. Though I don't actually care to know how WikiEd project works but the project management has more problem that needs addressing than the newbie creators. For instance Data Politics, Racial Identity/Class in Colombia (Post-Abolition), Digital Divide in Colombia, The Digital Divide in Myanmar and many more are created in similar essay style from WikiEd Project and basically not conforming with many Wikipedia guidelines. These and many I know of have been either deleted or draftified in few hours of their creation this will only discourage the newbies creator when they understand there Adticles are deleted sooner than they thought of. — Ammarpad (talk) 00:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.