Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Zone FC
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Also delete The Zone FC 10 henrik•talk 21:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Zone FC[edit]
- The Zone FC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an unsourced article with no indication of notability. My search found a lot of ghits, but a lack of good (IMO) reliable sources. I see blogs and youtube entries, as well as the organization's website, but perhaps someone can find some reliable sources in all those hits. I have stronger feelings that the event mentioned below should be deleted.
I am also nominating the following related page because this event has no independent sources and appears to just be routine sports results:
- The Zone FC 10 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Papaursa (talk) 04:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 04:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete the event, weak delete the organization It's clear the event fails WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT. There may well be reliable sources in that mess of google hits for the organization, but the article is unsourced and the burden of proof is on those who claim notability. Astudent0 (talk) 18:12, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As mentioned above there are a lot of hit on Google and Google News, but it seems mostly be forums, blogs and routine event results and organization profiles. I think we'd be hard pressed to find significant coverage in independent sources to meet WP:GNG. --TreyGeek (talk) 01:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.