Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The World of Torr
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Bobet 21:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The World of Torr[edit]
Non-notable mod software for a videogame. Doesn't meet WP:SOFTWARE. Wikipedia is not for stuff you made one day. My vote is Delete. ju66l3r 20:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 01:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - An awfully written article. Pure vanity and advertising. Possible notability with the Hall of Fame, but without a legitimate source for that information it's so much hot air. The Kinslayer 10:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- NWN: World of Torr accepts donations in violation of the Bioware's EULA and brags about the $2000 its raised since inception on their website. Bioware has consistently pressed legal action against any server that accepts money to play. Some sites have tried to skirt this by taking payment as "donations" but this is covered under their "exploit commercially" clause. They've notably kept off the main Bioware forums possibly to escape censure from the company. I've quoted the EULA on the discussion page for that article. This looks like wikitizing for their server and if the end up getting money then this is oh so much spam.~LD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.152.181.251 (talk • contribs)
- Delete. The controversial portion, if verified, might warrant a mention in the Neverwinter Nights article, but otherwise this mod doesn't seem particularly notable. --Alan Au 22:52, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As above. —Wrathchild (talk) 16:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.