Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wizard of Oz (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wizard of Oz (video game)[edit]

Unreleased game annouced by Zoo Digital, however it has passed the listed release date and i cannot find that it has been released. the only link appears to be dead. A google search comes up with information less articles. GameSpot doesnt seem to have heard about it. Maybe it was planned but has been abandoned, but really it should be just deleted until some substantial evidence arrives, also Zoo Digital Publishing has no mention of it being an upcoming game. Salavat (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Salavat (talk) 18:18, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the existing SNES game of the same name. This newer version doesn't look to come out. Nate • (chatter) 18:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and move Restore The to the original game's title, definitely. Nate • (chatter) 22:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think the existing article should be moved to this title. Zagalejo^^^ 18:46, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeh id have to agree, the proper title for the SNES game should be used. Salavat (talk) 18:48, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - Delete this unsourced and apparently unreleased game and move the SNES game here - according to the box, it should have its 'The' returned. ~ mazca ^t|c 20:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and move SNES game, agree with above. --Banime (talk) 21:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Clubmarx (talk) 22:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and borderline A7. There's nothing here. Also, I know who the subject of this spam is directed towards, with all due respect to the reviewer in question. MuZemike (talk) 05:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete They forgot to ask the Wizard for notability. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.