Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wesley Inquirer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki 21:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wesley Inquirer[edit]

An unsourced article on a non-notable High School student newsletter. A contested PROD, with reason for contesting on talk page. Mattinbgn/^talk 21:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn/^talk 21:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete no assertion of notability (it's a student mag from a secondary school - so what?). Other than that - non-notable until someone else has written about it so how about some secondary references from WP:RS?.
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL.Garrie 21:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment how many of the PSA schools are now going to have articles about each other's student magazines now in an effort to meet WP:N?Ga rr ie 21:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, not notable at all.--Svetovid 22:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - not notable; a student news paper will NOT be on a encyclopedia Hirohisat 22:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Per nom as another growing example of Aquinascruft of the Australian projects which i'm quite frankly fed up dealing with. Thewinchester ^(talk) 01:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom. Fails any barometer of WP:V and WP:N, and is a fine example of school cruft. Orderinchaos 02:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It might be worth a mention in the Wesley College article but not as a standalone article. Capitalistroadster 03:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a non-notable high school newspaper. Lankiveil 10:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.