Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vortex
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Vortex[edit]
While it looks like some work went into this, it's little more than an advertisement for a LAN gaming center. It should also be noted that one of the tournaments that this hosts has been deleted before. JuJube 05:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 00:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep I have kept a neutral POV while writing this article and The Vortex happens to be quite notable in the gaming community. I'd also like to add every article has to start somewhere and I think there is alot of room for improvement than to judge so quickly. Omegacommand 05:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, no evidence of notability (see WP:N). TJ Spyke 05:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looks spam-alicious to me. 'Neutral' doesn't include such phrases as "one of the best". Cantras 06:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sources to assert and support notability can be provided. Surely this got some coverage in trade magazines or local papers. --Haemo 07:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- notability not shown. This is the second incarnation of this article; an earlier version was deleted last Octoberl as spam.[1] If press coverage is shown that meets the requirements of WP:CORP, then I'm happy to keep. --A. B. (talk) 11:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unsourced. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I know for a fact The Vortex has been featured in quite a few local papers and would like some time to research this and add sources and references. Omegacommand 18:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sources are added to indicate notability; also, clearly needs cleanup of its advertising-like tone and lack of complete sentences. — brighterorange (talk) 20:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looks like advertising to me. --RFBailey 20:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Mmmm — Southern fried spam. Realkyhick 03:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Advertising Tnomad 13:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.