Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Valentine Constitution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Valentine Constitution[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rehash of draft constitution proposed by a 2016 presidential candidate. It's a subtle promo for his campaign, probably too subtle for G11, but promotional nonetheless. Bazj (talk) 23:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC) Draft:Valentine (philosopher) by the same author clarifies the link to the political campaign. Bazj (talk) 23:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bazj (talk) 23:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Bazj (talk) 23:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - spectacularly non-notable. Not a single hit on any of the search engines (except his own website). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – article makes it seem like this is an actual constitution, which can be rewritten yet would still be a resounding non-notable creation of a non-notable fringe candidate.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.