Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Untouchable Tour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Untouchable Tour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NTOUR at this time, as there is currently insufficient information/reliable sources regarding this tour. This is the exact same WP:TOOSOON case that happened with the articles for her other two tours; they were both created at times when it was inappropriate to do so, just like this one. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 02:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain. I abstain. Pikachu is my homeboy (talk) 03:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Sockpuppet of Incorrigible Troll (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). GAB^Hello! 14:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Also, I do not get the abstain joke, but I like it.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 03:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although it does seem notable, there is no venerability within the article at all. NinthTail (talk) 03:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC) Sockpuppet of Taokaka (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). GAB^Hello! 14:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable now.--MaranoFan (talk) 16:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as too soon for now. SwisterTwister talk 23:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.