Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unknowable Room

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango 123 19:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Unknowable Room[edit]

Delete. I do not believe that the article in question is sufficiently notable to merit inclusion in Wikipedia. — Mike • 03:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, we don't need an article for every Harry Potter web site out there, the main ones already have established articles and I believe that is quite sufficient. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 05:26, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's really not necessary to have articles for every Harry Potter-related fansite on the internet. --Coredesat 10:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For a Harry Potter fansite, its 2,827,381 Alexa traffic rank is really not that impressive. The goal of the article seems to be disparaging fanfiction.net. It's their right to throw out people who break the rules. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete, Big Name Fans set up their own Big Name Fan fiction server after a fan fight with fanfiction.net. fancruft. Alexa traffic ranking funny too. Fails WP:WEB. - Motor (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is like a log of the ins and outs of a small group of fans. It belongs on the web, but not in an encyclopedia. Interlingua ^talk 13:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --->|Newyorktimescrossword 21:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)|[reply]
Delete. Fancruft. AgentPeppermint 17:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.