Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Union (professional wrestling)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with The Corporation (professional wrestling). Everybody agrees that there is no individual notability, and noobody so far objected against the merger.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Union (professional wrestling)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article says "short lived". No notable HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Very good observation. The article basically admits to the lack of notability right off the bat. Should be a speedy delete, IMO. Feedback ^☎ 02:08, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with The Corporation (professional wrestling). They were a splinter group, and wouldn't have existed without it. Absolutely no mention of The Union in that article now, not even a Wikilink. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:28, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with The Corporation (professional wrestling), no individual notabilty. J04n(talk page) 00:18, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with The Corporation (professional wrestling). Have to agree with those above, Union was a short part of that particular storyline and probably isn't notable enough for a stand-alone article.LordMaldad2000 (talk) 04:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.