Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The UK Pitbulls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The UK Pitbulls[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable tagteam from England. Very little to suggest that they are notible personalities. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - They've received coverage in the UK. Here's what I found: North Norfolk News (2011), Eastern Daily Press (2014), Worthing Herald (2016), and Worthing Herald (2017). Nikki♥311 23:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 23:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 00:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: What do folks think about the coverage above?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, !dave 11:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only 4 instances of coverage doesn't constitute notability - furthermore (and correct me if I'm wrong), all the sites referenced seem to not be notable publications. --Kirbanzo (talk) 19:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable defunct minor-league pro wrestling team Nufy7 (talk) 11:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - additional sources from national publications: The Mirror and BBC. Nikki♥311 20:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Reliable mainstreams sources provided by Nikki311 are sufficient to meet GNG requirements. GaryColemanFan (talk) 07:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.