Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ten Commandments for a Designer of Finnish Heraldry
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Ten Commandments for a Designer of Finnish Heraldry. MBisanz talk 00:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Ten Commandments for a Designer of Finnish Heraldry[edit]
- The Ten Commandments for a Designer of Finnish Heraldry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per WP:NOTMANUAL, content that lists instructions, tutorials or how-tos does not make a suitable Wikipedia article. This article's topic also constitutes non-notable fork content and may further constitute original research. Issues of wikification and WP:NOTMANUAL were brought up about a year ago or longer, and no significant improvement has been made, nor does such improve appear to be possible. The article's topic is necessarily non-notable fork content and unencyclopedic. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 00:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I think the best analogy here is with a page like The Ten Commandments. The WP article should not just say what they are, it should explain them and their history. These commandments seem to be the work of one author and so not really notable enough to give a full explanation of. An article about the book that they originated in would be more warranted. CapitalSasha ~ talk 01:22, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not wikipedic, but I would hope that some of the material can be incorporated into other articles. Deb (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Never became wikipedic. Junior Woodchuck (talk) 13:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, then delete Merge into Finnish heraldry, then delete as it is a highly unlikely search term. --GedUK 13:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.