Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tedder Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing based on early consensus. Missvain (talk) 00:23, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Tedder Club[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this is a likely hoax. It was created by a SPA and the account of the club’s foundation and naming seems fanciful. Even if true, it is not evident that a secret club about which almost nothing is known can be notable in Wikipedia terms. Of the two sources provided, the first is inaccessible online but does not seem relevant. The second simply shows that there was a genuine club in Egypt with the same name, that had nothing to do with the topic of this article. Mccapra (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Poorly sourced, unable to determine notability with what's provided. Oaktree b (talk) 23:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no SIGCOV in multiple RS to establish notability or even really confirm its existence. Mztourist (talk) 04:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have doubts as to whether or not this is real, but in any case notability has clearly not been shown and most of the article has no evidence to support it. Dunarc (talk) 19:57, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - completely unnecessary, possibly false, poorly written, etc. EPIC STYLE ^{(LET'S TALK)} 02:26, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete May not be a hoax, but I've seen hoaxes that were better sourced. No indication of notability. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.