Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The TV IV (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude (talk) 03:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The TV IV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not look to pass WP:WEBCRIT. Seeing primarily brief mentions in lists and primary sources. The 2008 AfD was closed as keep based on some pretty weak keep arguments (by 2017's standard at least, e.g. based on someone having posted it to Slashdot). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:49, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 22:15, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 22:15, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 22:15, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the blog post on USA Today goes as follows: " Somewhere, somehow, you knew an obsessed My Name is Earl fan was keeping track of everything on Earl's list. Here's what has been seen so far though some numbers have multiple entries. Will we ever see a "puked in drum set" episode? Or what about an ep where Earl apologizes to Joy for telling her that "Bruce Willis was a ghost?" Thanks to Zack S. for the tip. " with "Here's what has been seen so far " being a link to TV IV. [1] So that one doesn't even print TV IV by name. Slashdot is a little better but that just makes one secondary source that has significant (?) coverage. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:23, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, !dave 21:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.