Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Super Pops

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

The Super Pops

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The Super Pops (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. The only provided source which is possibly reliable is some local news coverage focusing on an interview with a local who was cast in this show [1]. The rest of the provided coverage does not appear to be reliable, with a guest appearance from an article in Variety that does not mention the subject at all. The primary editor for the article appears to be a UPE editor, particularly considering that they made a COI disclosure on their user page which they subsequently removed _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:14, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Delete. The coverage I could find is:

• [2] — local paper quoting one of the actors, Scarlet Sheppard, The content of the Totally TV Super Pops show is family friendly and fun
• [3] — minor coverage, unclear if this source is reliable
• [4] — minor coverage from local paper
• [5] — trivial mention

The subject does not meet WP:NTV or WP:GNG. userdude 05:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Lack of coverage that is significant in independent, reliable sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.