Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Space Between (2021 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Space Between (2021 film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This film went straight to digital. One negative review, from only one review in existence. See Rotten Tomatoes. Per WP:NFOE, to become notable, a film should have received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. This film does not have two reviews. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep – May not meet NFOE, does seem to meet WP:NFP (aka GNG) by virtue of the cast members. Of note it appears Kelsey Grammer is not just the lead actor (per billing on poster) but also composed half the music. Plenty of blue links in the cast/production team as well.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep but no prejudice if it gets deleted. The various Deadline Hollywood citations about casting and "upcoming" news kinda sorta vaguely could add up to a second source in addition to the NYT review, and yes, I know that's stretching. Ehh, it's a movie with a recognizable star, so it probably has a (very, very, very small) default notability. This is a really grey area though. -Markeer 03:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agree, this feels wrong but I see a people.com interview with Grammer discussing the young woman he acts with and some stuff on deadline.com discussing it. That and the NYT article pushes it over the notability hump. Also an NME article about Grammer and Weezer doing the soundtrack together, so the movie has some traction. A few hits on the soundtrack, Weezer ads to the notability of the package as a whole. Oaktree b (talk) 20:55, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep NYT review combined with coverage provided by Playlist [1], deadline.com [2] [3] is enough. Here is the article on making the film [4]. Kirill C1 (talk) 15:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:NFSOURCES. The Film Creator (talk) 16:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 'Straight to digital' isn't a valid argument against notability these days. There's plenty of coverage in addition to that already cited, including [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. --Michig (talk) 20:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.