Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Social Outcasts (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Social Outcasts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable tag team. Nothing sourced except move sets and week by week updates. True CRaysball | ^#RaysUp 01:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the group did not last very long and is now broken up, this is litterally all there is to write on them. It should be a section in the appropraite articles, not a seperate one. MPJ-DK 01:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - very unsuccessful and unimportant group. starship.paint ~ KO 01:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG, 3MB was more notable.LM2000 (talk) 02:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.LM2000 (talk) 02:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete even the stables that lasted 3-6 months proved to be more notable and successful than this one. Nickag989^talk 09:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - LM2000 said it perfectly. JTP ^(talk) 04:22, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.