Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Skies are Closer in Homesh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Skies are Closer in Homesh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 07:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (Keep added subsequently. Lourdes) Hi there. Did you consider WP:NFILM? The film is taught at a course at the University of Florida.^[1] and has been featured in the 25^th Annual Association for Israel Studies Conference^[2] Lourdes 10:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Reach Out to the Truth 15:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Reach Out to the Truth 15:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Reach Out to the Truth 15:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I have just deleted the whole summary section for being a copyvio from two sources. I copyedited the lead before noticing that the original, too, was a copyvio. There's not much left here, and no RS. Yoninah (talk) 19:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing !vote to Keep. E.M.Gregory has done a great job adding reliable sources, and I have added more. The article now meets GNG. Yoninah (talk) 17:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
keep minor documentary film, but it was shown at film festivals and did get some coverage in newspapers (see in particular Haaretz article that I added) and an academic - an academic who takes a highly critical,unsympathetic attitude towards the settlement movement) discusses this film in both a book and a journal article. I think sources I have added suffice to pass notability standards.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weakish Keep Following E.M.Gregory's sourcing. Note that this is a politically interesting subject matter shot by an a-typical director (religious right female director), a point view mostly missing from Israeli cinema, which makes this more notable than it would otherwise.Icewhiz (talk) 11:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.