Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Singles 2nd Ward
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 21:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Singles 2nd Ward (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film Dronebogus (talk) 16:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus (talk) 16:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus (talk) 16:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It is notable enough. Epachamo (talk) 17:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- comment Simply stating it is notable does not prove notability. Do you have any reliable secondary sources on it? Dronebogus (talk) 00:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete one review from a university newspaper is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as there is a lack of coverage in reliable sources, for example there are no external reviews listed at IMDb and no critics reviews at Rotten Tomatoes, does not pass WP:GNG imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.