Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sims 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 15:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced speculation. WP:NOT a crystal ball. Delete. Kusma (討論) 19:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - speculation. --Hurricane111 20:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 20:07, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete love the article It will be more advanced.. Well duh. Tokakeke 21:12, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or ...expand? As it is, though, delete it.. 64.30.14.50 04:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep thanks to user... --MaoJin 16:05, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, because I have updated it to be a real article, including some sourced information. -- Melissa Della 16:06, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I still don't see how this is more than speculation of some website, based on two words on other company websites. All that can be verified now is that rumors exist (and they don't seem to be notable, important rumors yet). Kusma (討論) 19:39, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- As an industry watcher, the listing publicly that they are working on TS3 means that the game is definitely in early production even if EA has not released a press statement yet. If the consensus is to delete, I'm fine with that, because I know the article will be back the moment further information is released. I just don't see what the need is to delete in the meantime. Simple as that. -- Melissa Della 07:09, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I still don't see how this is more than speculation of some website, based on two words on other company websites. All that can be verified now is that rumors exist (and they don't seem to be notable, important rumors yet). Kusma (討論) 19:39, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 18:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.