Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seventh-day Remnant Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Seventh-day Remnant Church

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and ORG. No significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. On scrutiny, appears to only exist as a web forum, not an actual denomination. Regards, James (^talk/_contribs) 23:46, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:31, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I searched, and I can't source it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:10, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would have to agree, Delete...Simbagraphix (talk) 12:14, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would say, Merge if adequate sourcing requisite for a stand-alone article cannot be found, since DDG did say that articles with "weak sourcing" on denominations are often kept. RegalodiAmerica (talk) 18:18, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:UNDUE would preclude merging into virtually any article related to the topic. Regards, James (^talk/_contribs) 17:57, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The lack of reliable coverage in third party sources has not been addressed. The WP:BURDEN falls upon those arguing merge or keep that this subject meets the inclusion criteria. I'm not entirely sure what would be the most appropriate merge target, but no subject is immune regardless of whom said it, from needing to meet the criteria of WP:SIGCOV even if the status quo has been relaxed. This is outlined in WP:OTHERSTUFF. Mkdw ^talk 17:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still nothing actually suggestive of its own notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.