Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scenic Route (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closed a bit early per WP:SNOW. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Scenic Route

Worthless stub on non-notable band. No sources, no hits, and the only claim to fame is an unsubstantiated claim for an award in Delaware. How this survived the first AFD I don't understand. Calton | Talk 00:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. "Local band," no label that I can find, no commerical releases, only self-released recordings. Hairhorn (talk) 00:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:35, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I can only assume the "no consensus" default keep was down to the fact that it wasn't categorised until a day before closure. Maybe should have been re-listed. Anyway, yes, non-notable. Fails WP:BAND on several counts. – B.hotep •talk• 11:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - coverage about the band is almost non-existent. The award they won is not significant. They may have success in the future, and when that happens, then it may be time for an article about them. -- Whpq (talk) 17:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I added the two citations, but it's not enough significant media coverage to pass WP:N. I also searched around trying to find some evidence of notability of the award the band won, but have come up empty. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.