Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Same Sky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn per SL93 Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Same Sky[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this passes WP:NFILM (it is actually a play) or WP:GNG. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems notable, contains significant claim to notability. If it is a play not sure what NFILM has to do with it. PatGallacher (talk) 18:58, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: Per [1] (Published by State University of New York Press), [2], [3] (published by Taylor & Francis), 1952 Billboard, 1952 Billboard, and snippets in the Google Books search engine dating back to 1952. New Statesman - "The production, by Dennis Vance and Peter Cotes, of The Same Sky gave viewers the chance to see for the first time the work of one of the very best of our younger actresses, Yvonne Mitchell. The Same Sky is her own play, and whether you ...", The Cambridge Review - "1951 - THEATRE THE SAME SKY By Yvonne Mitchell at the Arts Theatre Take two families, East End both of them, one British and the ... So Yvonne Mitchell's The Same Sky is a play of the bitterest conflict : on one side the battle-cry is of true ...", Playbill - "London born, Miss Mitchell was accepted into the Michel St. Denis Theatre School, a beginning made in the face of ... The Same Sky, her first produced play, won the Arts Council of Great Britain Award and she has had published a ...", and many more. SL93 (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well done, SL93--thanks. Drmies (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SL93. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 18:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.