Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Royalty Tour (Mary J. Blige and Nas Tour)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Royalty Tour (Mary J. Blige and Nas Tour)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination per consensus at RfD. I have no opinion on this article, nor if it should be deleted or kept. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NTOUR, a utterly MILL concert co-headlining tour, there is no ATD to do so. Same outcome as the Maroon 5 and Counting Crows AFD --2600:1700:9BF3:220:B9E1:5B8:C232:4F52 (talk) 01:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per my vote at the RfD: If there is anything mergeable, merge to Mary J. Blige and Nas articles. Retarget to the article that has better and more useful coverage of the tour. If the coverage is same at both, then ~~keep, or~~ retarget to one or the other, it doesn't matter, but before that move to a proper-titled The Royalty Tour without redirect. Jay 💬 02:15, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to keep the article, then try searching up and find sources from different media organizations such as reviews and revamp the article if you wish for. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:B9E1:5B8:C232:4F52 (talk) 02:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Right, the "keep" comment made sense at the RfD, not here. I have struck it off and re-phrased. Jay 💬 02:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is not notable and fails to meet WP:NTOUR. HorrorLover555 (talk) 04:54, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.