Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Search turns up lots of profiles in charity directories but I don't see any substantive independent coverage of this organization, fails WP:NORG. Reywas92^Talk 14:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 15:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment, and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ORGCRIT and WP:SIGCOV. It sounds like a worth organization, but a search of newspaper articles reveals one single article. Bearian (talk) 19:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.